Customisable communication

5 07 2008
Communication major dimensions scheme
Image via Wikipedia

While phones are good for personal level communication. Split second decisions may not be a good choice to put the memory into pressure. We need a interactive voice/text based communication system which transits the probabilistic responsive hours on the daily needs of individual with curves on address books.

Suppose one is moving near his car, so responsiveness should reduce in curved form on approaching so that a caller doesn’t disturb before driving or any related activity.

Communication should be broken down into combination of voice-text format and decisions conveying time limit depending on resposiveness should be listed there.

Addresses and identities of callers should be verified before the very first call is received.

I think this would de-clutter and enhance the collective performances whether with an individual or an organization.

Related articles

Related articles by Zemanta

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Advertisements




Think of clutter free communication.

20 06 2008
Communication major dimensions scheme

Image via Wikipedia

While phones are good for personal level communication. Split second decisions may not be a good choice to put the memory into pressure. We need a interactive voice/text based communication system which transits the probabilistic responsive hours on the daily needs of individual with curves on address books.

Suppose one is moving near his car, so responsiveness should reduce in curved form on approaching so that a caller doesn’t disturb before driving or any related activity.

Communication should be broken down into combination of voice-text format and decisions conveying time limit depending on resposiveness should be listed there.

Addresses and identities of callers should be verified before the very first call is received.

I think this would de-clutter and enhance the collective performances whether with an individual or an organization.

Related articles

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]




Organisational Architecture

20 05 2008
Chess Players in Dupont Circle
Image by dbking via Flickr

I have not worked in any large organization, still I offer an unbiased opinion.

Every business goes on reputation which is different from character. The founder CEOs really have very good visions which become secondary. But the one way “Order” communication has complicated the organizational problems. How?

The face value of the senior “Order” becomes an excuse and gives the employee “benefit of doubt” so that he can prove that the order has been obeyed without giving the outcome desired by the end user-“Customer”. Hierarchy aggravates the problem. This lack of interaction in employee is a natural tendency as he may want “home culture” in his corporate environment-or his colleague had taken an advantage (not realizing if ha has himself unknowingly) etc.

Every service is time bound package-we need to invent a calculus which would soften the rigid graphs and have a trend torch which will show the way with different cadres in different colors. Often customer feedback is the only key to narrowing and focus of the trend torch-we have to come out of good and bad-to good and learn-implement-follow equation. The employee will himself realize where he has to go to keep it more focussed and competitively upwards.

We have to remember that only true formula is=A simple equation.

Related articles

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]